From the very beginning, one of the most exciting possibilities of the Google Digitization Project was its potential to open up vast stores of text to a group of users to whom it had previously been inaccessible: people with visual impairments and print disabilities. Before Google (B.G.), students and scholars who wanted access to the contents of a print book had to request that the book be converted to braille, or digitized and OCRed, a special one-at-a-time process that took several weeks. This required lots of advance planning and significantly slowed the pace of study and research for these users. After Google (A.G.), with an increasing amount of the total published content in the world available digitally, that tedious process is no longer necessary. Students and scholars with print disabilities can experience the flow of moving from resource to resource without impediment for the first time ever. Here’s how.
Over the past couple of years, The University of Michigan Library has been working on a project to improve the accessibility of our digitized texts for visually impaired UM students, staff, and faculty. First, the team made accessibility improvements to the standard public interface for the HathiTrust Digital Library (formerly known as MBooks) and developed a text-only interface geared toward people with print disabilities that is optimized for screen reading software. Next, and most important, the Library figured out how to grant access to the full text of digitized books for qualified patrons, regardless of the book’s copyright status.
Like many other universities, the UM Services for Students with Disabilities (SSwD) has long offered book digitization service to students with disabilities upon request. This is explicitly allowed under section 121 of U.S. Copyright law.
Our new system basically does the same thing but on a much larger scale. The HathiTrust Digital Library currently provides access to over 4 million digitized volumes and will grow to over 10 million – visually impaired students will have full-text access to all of these volumes. We consider this just the beginning. Over the next year, we will continue to work on improvements to the interface and conduct more user assessments, and our HathiTrust partners are working together to create a framework through which we can offer this service to users at their institutions.
Once a University of Michigan student registers with the UM Services for Students with Disabilities any time she checks out a book that has been digitized, she will automatically receive an email with a URL. Once the student selects the link, she will be asked to login. The system will check to see whether the student is registered with SSwD as part of this program, and ensure that she has checked out this particular book. If the student passes both of those tests, she will get access to the entire full-text of the book, whether it is in copyright or not, in an interface that is optimized for use with screen readers. The Library’s Blog for Library Technology has more details on the technical elements for those who are interested.
Our system was endorsed by the National Federation for the Blind as a model for how libraries can serve visually impaired patrons in the digital age. It’s a great example of how digital technologies can extend the ability of libraries to serve their clients, and to extend learning and teaching beyond traditional populations.
As with the production of so many things that are of broad public value, this work could not have happened without the efforts of a committed champion. I am pleased to recognize the commitment and skill of Jack Bernard, an attorney in Michigan’s Office of the General Counsel, who has provided substantive and legal leadership in our efforts to make our collections accessible to our students with print disabilities. Jack’s efforts were recognized by the American Library Association, which gave him the L. Ray Patterson Copyright Award in 2009.
[…] Go to Publisher to continue reading […]
November 3, 2009 @ 1:02 am
As a visually impaired psychologist I applaudthe University of Michigan’s efforts to help print impaired individuals. At age 63 it makes me want to register a has a U. of M. student in order to experience this wonderful new world of education.
November 6, 2009 @ 11:08 am
Viva la Google Books!!
November 24, 2009 @ 4:47 am
I am a regular GoogleBooks user and make heavy use of your 1550-1750 AD science references. I make similar use of extremely rare documents obtained from the collections at Yale and Harvard.
The system keeps banning me from accessing any of these materials, due perhaps to my prolonged use (2+ hours of research typically), and downloads on and off during the day. According to the ‘Sorry’ screen that pops up, I am being automatically interpreted as an automated downloading tool. But I do all of this by hand, and very erratically, not using any set of standardized commands or such. Each time this happens I have to fill out some eforms and provide them with information about my system to regain access (my server address), a process which takes them about a day to correct so I can reaccess the GoogleBooks sites.
For this reason, I am not certain GoogleBooks is the best avenue for students to take when they are doing research. This glitch in the system tends to slow down their performance and halt any projects related research any of them are trying to complete on time. Fortunately, I know how to deal with this and have posted a way to deal with this at the GoogleHelp site, so any future students with the same experiences can more quickly get back into being productive. Still, some students have just been left with no knowledge of where to go or what to do whenever this happens, and I suspect this must be happening at other teaching institutions.
I have read the conyright infringement policies that they have in place. So this is not an issue.
Have you had similar complaints from your end as an information specialist and provider?
Have you any suggestions as to avoid being automatically banned from the GoogleBooks? (sometimes daily)
I believe there is value in this system, but the security tools are gumming up the works, and its usefulness as an information source.
February 26, 2010 @ 1:29 pm