<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Michigan of the East goes Open Access</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulcourant.net/2008/02/16/the-michigan-of-the-east-goes-open-access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulcourant.net/2008/02/16/the-michigan-of-the-east-goes-open-access/</link>
	<description>Paul Courant's blog about libraries, economics, public policy, and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:09:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cate</title>
		<link>http://paulcourant.net/2008/02/16/the-michigan-of-the-east-goes-open-access/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Cate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulcourant.net/2008/02/16/the-michigan-of-the-east-goes-open-access/#comment-228</guid>
		<description>This is a very refreshing perspective. As a Library Science student, I spend an awful lot of time reading apocalyptic predictions of a post-commercial academic publishing world. While I see that there are risks involved in open access, I think you&#039;ve laid out the benefits. I know change is always a scary prospect for libraries and librarians, and it&#039;s wonderful to hear a reasoned, positive perspective. thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very refreshing perspective. As a Library Science student, I spend an awful lot of time reading apocalyptic predictions of a post-commercial academic publishing world. While I see that there are risks involved in open access, I think you&#8217;ve laid out the benefits. I know change is always a scary prospect for libraries and librarians, and it&#8217;s wonderful to hear a reasoned, positive perspective. thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://paulcourant.net/2008/02/16/the-michigan-of-the-east-goes-open-access/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulcourant.net/2008/02/16/the-michigan-of-the-east-goes-open-access/#comment-209</guid>
		<description>I agree with you wholeheartedly.  As a current Harvard student, this also shows a large leap for Harvard, which is only now beginning to crawl out of its feudalistic hole.  As noted in Darnton&#039;s op-ed in the Crimson, it was only recently that Harvard managed to consider its library as a unified entity and not a confederation of segments.  What Darnton calls the &quot;spirit of the &#039;one-university&#039;&quot; is slowly, after long last, accelerating.  Harvard, a stubborn, often oblivious institution, is finally making turns to normalcy, and students such as I, a Michigan alumnus who cannot understand the concept of a feudalistic university, will be more comfortable and more productive at Harvard in the future.  On that note, while this news is a good step in the right direction, Harvard is a long way from meeting the ideals that come from its title Michigan of the East.  With hope, someday it will achieve such relevancy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you wholeheartedly.  As a current Harvard student, this also shows a large leap for Harvard, which is only now beginning to crawl out of its feudalistic hole.  As noted in Darnton&#8217;s op-ed in the Crimson, it was only recently that Harvard managed to consider its library as a unified entity and not a confederation of segments.  What Darnton calls the &#8220;spirit of the &#8216;one-university&#8217;&#8221; is slowly, after long last, accelerating.  Harvard, a stubborn, often oblivious institution, is finally making turns to normalcy, and students such as I, a Michigan alumnus who cannot understand the concept of a feudalistic university, will be more comfortable and more productive at Harvard in the future.  On that note, while this news is a good step in the right direction, Harvard is a long way from meeting the ideals that come from its title Michigan of the East.  With hope, someday it will achieve such relevancy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pages tagged "scholarship"</title>
		<link>http://paulcourant.net/2008/02/16/the-michigan-of-the-east-goes-open-access/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Pages tagged "scholarship"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulcourant.net/2008/02/16/the-michigan-of-the-east-goes-open-access/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>[...] bookmarks tagged scholarship   The Michigan of the East goes Open Access&#160;saved by 3 others  &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;YUFKGJH bookmarked on 02/16/08 &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bookmarks tagged scholarship   The Michigan of the East goes Open Access&nbsp;saved by 3 others  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;YUFKGJH bookmarked on 02/16/08 | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://paulcourant.net/2008/02/16/the-michigan-of-the-east-goes-open-access/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulcourant.net/2008/02/16/the-michigan-of-the-east-goes-open-access/#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Nice post. 

One of the questions I have about the ramifications surrounding Harvard&#039;s Open somAccess policy is how will professors/researchers qualify what they publish? 

My guess is the academic societies (be it the old guard or up &amp; comers) would step in to arbitrate whether someone&#039;s research is &quot;new&quot; or &quot;scholarly&quot; (or accurate) but until more of that infrastructure is in place Harvard&#039;s vote, it seems to me, is more symbolic than anything.

When is a work deemed scholarly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. </p>
<p>One of the questions I have about the ramifications surrounding Harvard&#8217;s Open somAccess policy is how will professors/researchers qualify what they publish? </p>
<p>My guess is the academic societies (be it the old guard or up &amp; comers) would step in to arbitrate whether someone&#8217;s research is &#8220;new&#8221; or &#8220;scholarly&#8221; (or accurate) but until more of that infrastructure is in place Harvard&#8217;s vote, it seems to me, is more symbolic than anything.</p>
<p>When is a work deemed scholarly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

